From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Arne Babenhauserheide Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel,gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: GNU Guile 2.1.7 released (beta) Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 19:04:59 +0100 Message-ID: <87lgso27qs.fsf@web.de> References: <87y3x3zt6v.fsf@pobox.com> <87tw7kviu6.fsf@pobox.com> <87k28fmqhu.fsf@web.de> <8760jwvnql.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1488391541 26644 195.159.176.226 (1 Mar 2017 18:05:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 18:05:41 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: mu4e 0.9.16; emacs 25.1.1 Cc: guile-user@gnu.org, guile-devel@gnu.org To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 01 19:05:36 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cj8d5-0006Uo-R0 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 19:05:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48021 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cj8dB-0004Je-T3 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 13:05:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43629) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cj8cz-0004HA-Tp for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 13:05:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cj8cu-00031O-S2 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 13:05:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.14]:50972) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cj8cj-0002uW-AW; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 13:05:13 -0500 Original-Received: from fluss ([85.212.2.52]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb003 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MI5yY-1cjg3a0v0g-003v1T; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 19:05:05 +0100 In-reply-to: <8760jwvnql.fsf@pobox.com> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:UYAMzSWZKzuq+X3J79qL5y0taOHEF05yYZZC1LXUiXB4SXRxW9c bcat1suQLXHiFQj/ZhK8RtQo9r6AWuea0Um4xazdD001rMfa7GKE6Z5kPkfbG9UmroNifEM aP1zOhQTT8Vixv7iFNBBnxfD1+gIU33thh2bs8bMOXLmy8OHJCYO4FhIvR3sYdiur2jkQxA EdO7lVhfmaq2V1Pu9NxAg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:gmR9XyNt0vs=:9F3mTZbWmx+7RDVCFGOE3/ 8OtsVecazr+/o4nF5UqS4b+69n4PZOPX4j3VPS2zywdVOJczNz9d+gMumDFk3OtWrhrhnyeN1 DqQxPOpf1xhBof2q1jaDxuMIxT6HXZOhcbGjG/3hOzKSf/XWCtcEe65DSyrYj77DVb2iBc2eZ z/gNJNvTtgSTHe5JX/lPQ2XrRhGjgLU3Jh/wngXTxsCrcZnOW66N4JihLREeODu5PfPc0VaE2 mAGCY24DaGWMJ4L3jn8mQiU6XsF6Yrt1lKDYWuz+rjpJ/8gCK60N715Nm/T1okAanPodadTPk lK3RBB+MOIj7l63Q7ylQYCfheTJNQQIlqyccxgNP9KNVELf/+G6WOQpX2VAxJzOsLBy3+yeKp BK41/0X0tiuOowoJQAfdeE3Kgw0iy6LH+rCfQKBkVw6E83168ZQ/EaCfwMafgiDpjjs6u2Vqj cGGikut2VMUIltnxcl5OndTNslYDqLQk8hsKZP6b2Ry/Qzvh//ncEIsMJRxPapLELzW3PL3rG 5XKjeSx2ymWYG0uwp1KtUoEx8FY2CfwtPViVvY1ZbDYv+GPyG8yLcFfefmZ0gJ+3o94jqkSkn pfh0azmZ3NeBmaeFi1ZX8tw6L7LDGW7Khmcn5D8iI0upoyFBF2TPtL5oouStNMkj12n2SlNsP NzUEBn6bxevQoQFIWqj1gNFK9PGbE3vRTSV3tFY/TeW7lCUIKyDBQPyt5orjm/vcrfE8YLjzn YzBpf0kxOBv/Bp4gLo49MDIRKSBISva8T8j+MjuU1RtTHThcoa9Ukd+9BSE= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.14 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:18970 gmane.lisp.guile.user:13369 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Andy Wingo writes: > On Fri 24 Feb 2017 18:46, Arne Babenhauserheide writes: > >> The main strategical question I see for that is: Does anything make it >> harder to complete or improve the lilypond transition to Guile 2? >> >> Is there something which would need to be done before 2.2 which could >> make it easier for lilypond developers? > > I don't know of any concrete points here. 2.2 is not dissimilar to 2.0. > If you someone like to try to determine exactly what specific bits of > Guile 2.2 impact Lilypond (and indeed any big application using the C > interface), that would be welcome :) I guess I'd start with NEWS to see > what's up. I=E2=80=99ll have to write up my test setup for lilypond, too =E2=80=A6 Best wishes, Arne =2D-=20 Unpolitisch sein hei=C3=9Ft politisch sein ohne es zu merken --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJYtw1OAAoJEBPvjUUkA8PrfdcP/Rri19KnXEa3fm2JiTPkiru9 Fph12LxRzYBB+ytTUEpmaPxrwOwAjZ3sPUBydVxOFBlrgILY9yqTJEHUrRYzYR4S rlrD/Nmnuk0rygoy/edhXAiPkfQkV5OV2OxwjpOU4VzL1ZJ5SxDj7mdwOCEAmetm B+3rCcLU2kY67rfORF2305f0zvizEiIvUKAgc8znd3/cSTalUdTKZ/kv7Id0rm1L hUm2hxPgzX03RfUx9jEMrNDeKg5IAMkcR1+h6Ich6cMHFVyPEeqhKyZKasP2KY2I DCgkrjhXS9vp4opFAiOMJIPwkHJQCmwQ/HVDex8sGzTGwSh49RXM5Xr1tWTkb0P4 lWnKd8CSBL9cak1A/fy6SlPRk4+xV6MzNvsoBDqcjWKiFjZnKRC3X2OIDSY8bz4N 4w0hNwuVLfAUBwp7pl5aJSOj+tLs0hRG5VetCC3UcuQoOlFLO8CqtCiDFIovYlUs 7ZkHpaEAsZEzZv8eEgwE8jNzCpNV8W6FxcL4CU2Q1wbj1ulZgGBlqKsnDZvwDxEY GeIbGf+r927orzbccDkMgkn3paY+KtCFhvAmjnzToc1gJyyHIFhdTPFGnKOr0x5x hgLuJWCuAiv7lOTj+s5ieTVKkFb7F82O8xgYFloQsi4JMt2pGevle1Q2wnGHSC/B hS75vbEAwSh1qzKHczA2 =7fwQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--