Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:

> Andy Wingo started a new discussion on libguile/bytevectors.c: 
>
>  810   810    static inline void  
>  811   811    twos_complement (mpz_t value, size_t size)  
>  812   812    {  
>  813     -  unsigned long bit_count;  
>    813   +  scm_t_unum bit_count;  
>
> Given that we require in-memory addressability for array elements,
> let's use ssize_t for this.

That makes some sense, but using ssize_t would change it from unsigned
to signed, are you sure we shouldn't choose size_t?

New patch attached using size_t, also up at

    https://gitlab.com/janneke/guile/-/commit/b587e04e6b0e0fe37cb8774609a51ac7e04127a5

Greetings,
Janneke