From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: More Bug Stuff Date: 07 Apr 2002 23:38:12 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87k7rjjikb.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> References: <873cypn2a2.fsf@tyrell.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> <87d6xtzhzv.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87hen4z5xf.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87eli6onpm.fsf@tyrell.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> <87vgbhj09w.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <874rin3ggy.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1018220475 1267 127.0.0.1 (7 Apr 2002 23:01:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 23:01:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: evan@glug.org, guile-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16uLet-0000KK-00 for ; Mon, 08 Apr 2002 01:01:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16uKNS-0007eu-00; Sun, 07 Apr 2002 17:39:10 -0400 Original-Received: from dialin.speedway42.dip45.dokom.de ([195.138.42.45] helo=zagadka.ping.de) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16uKJh-0007Vv-00 for ; Sun, 07 Apr 2002 17:35:17 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 1024 invoked by uid 1000); 7 Apr 2002 21:38:12 -0000 Original-To: ttn@glug.org In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 20 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:322 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:322 Thien-Thi Nguyen writes: > From: Marius Vollmer > Date: 07 Apr 2002 13:17:49 +0200 > > I have ticked all bug reports in my local archives anyway, so I'll > just import those. I think this will be reasonably complete. > > would you like me to not look at m.l. archives 2001-07 through 2001-09, > (see TODO)? Yes, please do. > generally, what does it mean when someone claims a parent task of an > already claimed subtask? what kind of dependency does this set up? > what is the proposed conflict resolution protocol? Yeah, difficult. I claimed the whole baby but then it occurred to me that it is not a really meaningful thing to do. I will take that back and just add the proper subtask with the proper timeframe. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel