From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Ryde Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: doco srfi-1 iota Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 08:43:19 +1000 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87k7aoit14.fsf@zip.com.au> References: <871xx2ov97.fsf@zip.com.au> <16137.65380.115639.994664@localhost.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1057964207 19014 80.91.224.249 (11 Jul 2003 22:56:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 22:56:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 12 00:56:43 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19b6ol-0004wK-00 for ; Sat, 12 Jul 2003 00:56:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19b6pE-00017u-QB for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 18:57:12 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19b6p2-00012f-2w for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 18:57:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19b6mV-0007e0-3q for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 18:54:54 -0400 Original-Received: from snoopy.pacific.net.au ([61.8.0.36]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19b6lw-0007Or-5A for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 18:53:48 -0400 Original-Received: from sunny.pacific.net.au (sunny.pacific.net.au [203.2.228.40]) by snoopy.pacific.net.au (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.3) with ESMTP id h6BMraZY022421; Sat, 12 Jul 2003 08:53:37 +1000 Original-Received: from wisma.pacific.net.au (wisma.pacific.net.au [210.23.129.72]) by sunny.pacific.net.au with ESMTP id h6BMrZQg015820; Sat, 12 Jul 2003 08:53:35 +1000 (EST) Original-Received: from localhost (ppp107.dyn228.pacific.net.au [203.143.228.107]) by wisma.pacific.net.au (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6BMrLnh013677; Sat, 12 Jul 2003 08:53:31 +1000 (EST) Original-Received: from gg by localhost with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19b6bq-0000g7-00; Sat, 12 Jul 2003 08:43:22 +1000 Original-To: hanwen@cs.uu.nl Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: <16137.65380.115639.994664@localhost.localdomain> (Han-Wen Nienhuys's message of "Tue, 8 Jul 2003 01:16:52 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090019 (Oort Gnus v0.19) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2617 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2617 Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > > which begs the question, why aren't the SRFIs themselves used as > documentation? Oh, well, I suppose redoing it matches the format of the rest of the manual, and allows nice indexing and cross references. In any case I made this particular change. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel