From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: PATCH for guile-readline/Makefile.am Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 00:42:28 -0600 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87k73s75t7.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> References: <20040107215637.GA5971@pazuzu> <87n08q5k65.fsf@zip.com.au> <4005EA1E.9090900@vzavenue.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1074235800 8588 80.91.224.253 (16 Jan 2004 06:50:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 06:50:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 16 07:49:56 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AhNno-000664-00 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 07:49:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AhNlg-000298-6u for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 01:47:44 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AhNiA-00012G-NZ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 01:44:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AhNhW-0000qT-7G for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 01:43:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [66.93.216.237] (helo=defaultvalue.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AhNgk-0000EZ-Kh for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 01:42:38 -0500 Original-Received: from raven.i.defaultvalue.org (raven.i.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E896402C; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 00:42:29 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by raven.i.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EBC9B1EF023; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 00:42:28 -0600 (CST) Original-To: Richard Todd In-Reply-To: <4005EA1E.9090900@vzavenue.net> (Richard Todd's message of "Wed, 14 Jan 2004 19:17:18 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3226 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3226 Richard Todd writes: > For what it's worth, I liked merging readline into guile-core the > best, but if the license issue is too much to overcome, then I don't > see much difference in quality between the 'link' approaches and the > 'new directory' approach. If there were going to be lots more > ice-9/xx.scm files for readline, then the new directory would > definitlely by cleaner. I'd favor the guile-readline/ice-9/readline.scm approach as well. Thought about trying it out yesterday evening, but ran out of time... -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel