From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: undefined reference to `scm_init_guile' Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 22:41:16 +0000 Message-ID: <87k6b1x6r7.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <87u0a7tfex.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <20060310064102.GA11885@esat.kuleuven.be> <87veumvtls.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <20060310222332.GA23867@esat.kuleuven.be> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1142030749 30462 80.91.229.2 (10 Mar 2006 22:45:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 22:45:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Guile Development Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 10 23:45:48 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FHqMh-0007Pa-Ts for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 23:45:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FHqMh-0003yh-8K for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:45:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FHqMH-0002K5-CV for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:45:17 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FHqMD-0001vE-Ak for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:45:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FHqMC-0001qD-ME for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:45:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.84.72.33] (helo=mail3.uklinux.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FHqPa-0001X6-Bs for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:48:42 -0500 Original-Received: from laruns (host86-129-144-246.range86-129.btcentralplus.com [86.129.144.246]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AF6340A06B; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 22:45:11 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from laruns (laruns [127.0.0.1]) by laruns (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E389FD5E; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 22:41:16 +0000 (GMT) Original-To: steven mestdagh In-Reply-To: <20060310222332.GA23867@esat.kuleuven.be> (steven mestdagh's message of "Fri, 10 Mar 2006 23:23:32 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5771 Archived-At: steven mestdagh writes: > Neil Jerram [2006-03-10, 22:10:39]: >> >> Digging a bit further, this looks like it's caused by >> HAVE_PTHREAD_ATTR_GETSTACK not being defined. Can you confirm that >> when you run ./configure, it says that pthread_attr_getstack can't be >> found? > > no, this function is found, and HAVE_PTHREAD_ATTR_GETSTACK is defined > in config.h. OK, so it's HAVE_LIBC_STACK_END that is not defined, then? When this is the case, 1.8 leaves scm_init_guile undefined, whereas 1.6 would use the vast pile of magic in gc_os_dep.c. Does that sound right? If it is, I wonder why the change was made to remove the gc_os_dep.c fallback option; I can't see anything obvious in the ChangeLog. (gc_os_dep.c and the necessary scm_get_stack_base() definitions are still there in 1.8, they're just not used.) Neil _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel