From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: SRFI-9 and `equal?' Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 23:44:19 +0100 Message-ID: <87k67mt2nw.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <874pyy8ibf.fsf@laas.fr> <87slmighkv.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <874pyxvsfh.fsf@laas.fr> <87wtbsfwo4.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87mzcoqff0.fsf@laas.fr> <87u06v5hoz.fsf@zip.com.au> <874pyqa7dd.fsf@laas.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1150152321 29916 80.91.229.2 (12 Jun 2006 22:45:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 22:45:21 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 13 00:45:19 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fpv9q-0006RG-4p for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 00:45:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fpv9p-0007t2-M8 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 18:45:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fpv9f-0007nC-UT for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 18:45:07 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fpv9e-0007lx-Ut for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 18:45:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fpv9d-0007lb-UG for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 18:45:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.84.72.33] (helo=mail3.uklinux.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FpvIS-0005PB-CL for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 18:54:12 -0400 Original-Received: from laruns (host81-129-157-146.range81-129.btcentralplus.com [81.129.157.146]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C5E409FD9 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 22:44:34 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from laruns (laruns [127.0.0.1]) by laruns (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F076FDDB for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 23:44:19 +0100 (BST) Original-To: Guile-Devel In-Reply-To: <874pyqa7dd.fsf@laas.fr> ( =?iso-8859-1?q?Ludovic_Court=E8s's_message_of?= "Mon, 12 Jun 2006 14:25:18 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5977 Archived-At: ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic Court=E8s) writes: > This is untrue: consider for instance `string=3D?' and `char=3D?'. Yes, you're right that Scheme isn't completely consistent here. But records feel to me more like lists/vectors than chars/strings, so I think you've made the right decision in your latest patch. > Let me know if I can go ahead with this. Looks fine to me; very nice. Regards, Neil _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel