From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Plan for guile-debugging integration Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:25:24 +0100 Message-ID: <87k678f1h7.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <87mzcdm3v5.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87ac89sibc.fsf@laas.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1151069318 32321 80.91.229.2 (23 Jun 2006 13:28:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 13:28:38 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 23 15:28:34 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ftli3-000256-Vb for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 15:28:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ftli3-0005Mi-86 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 09:28:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ftli1-0005Md-EJ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 09:28:29 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ftlhy-0005Lv-LC for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 09:28:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ftlhy-0005Ls-GL for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 09:28:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.84.72.33] (helo=mail3.uklinux.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FtltB-0002kJ-8l for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 09:40:01 -0400 Original-Received: from laruns (host81-129-157-146.range81-129.btcentralplus.com [81.129.157.146]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 463B0409FE2 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 13:25:58 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from laruns (laruns [127.0.0.1]) by laruns (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71CED6FE97 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:25:24 +0100 (BST) Original-To: Guile Development In-Reply-To: <87ac89sibc.fsf@laas.fr> ( =?iso-8859-1?q?Ludovic_Court=E8s's_message_of?= "Mon, 19 Jun 2006 09:41:59 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5991 Archived-At: ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic Court=E8s) writes: > Neil Jerram writes: > >> 1. Scheme code >> >> By default I'd add these under (ice-9) - but perhaps we should >> consider something else? Please let me know if you have ideas. > > Maybe you could create a sub-directory, like `(ice-9 debugging)'? Yes, good idea; I'll do that. >> I should also say that I plan to document my Guile/Emacs interface as >> the "official" or recommended one. If you are concerned about that, >> please let me know asap. > > No, but we need to make sure it does not lack too many features compared > with the implementation-neutral `scheme-mode' that comes with Emacs, and No problem there, because my mode builds on top of scheme-mode. > perhaps also compared to `quack.el'. I haven't looked at quack for a while, but I will do so again soon. > Overall, your plan looks very good to me. And I'm sure users will all > find it very pleasant. :-) I hope so. Thanks for your comments! Regards, Neil _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel