From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: request review: branch "wingo" Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 09:51:50 +0200 Message-ID: <87k564reuh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87r60dir51.fsf@gnu.org> <87r60de5wk.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1238572526 22730 80.91.229.12 (1 Apr 2009 07:55:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 07:55:26 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 01 09:56:43 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LovJT-0001lI-9e for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 09:56:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47528 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LovI5-0005dF-NU for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 03:55:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LovI1-0005co-J8 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 03:55:13 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LovHx-0005Zq-3x for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 03:55:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41361 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LovHw-0005ZX-OS for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 03:55:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:48990) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LovHw-0002NA-2j for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 03:55:08 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LovHv-00057H-DB for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 03:55:07 -0400 Original-Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LovHq-0002G2-UF for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 07:55:02 +0000 Original-Received: from 193.50.110.227 ([193.50.110.227]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 07:55:02 +0000 Original-Received: from ludo by 193.50.110.227 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 07:55:02 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 30 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.50.110.227 X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 12 Germinal an 217 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: i686-pc-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.90 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:eq3rCGyC6XnTs3+QXYFPZqQUj/o= X-detected-kernel: by mx20.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:8380 Archived-At: Hello! Andy Wingo writes: > On Tue 31 Mar 2009 14:31, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >>>> Besides, there's the thread about cross-compilation where we mention >>>> building the compiler with an already installed Guile that may have an >>>> inappropriate stack limit. >>> >>> I don't think that is relevant. Since the Guile that is running would >>> choose a stack size appropriate for it, based on the host getrlimit, >>> there would be no problem. >> >> The already-installed Guile wouldn't use getrlimit(2) since that would >> be an old 1.8. > > You probably saw the other response already, but I don't think that the > compiler will work with 1.8 as a "host". Yes, I saw it right after, so forget my remark. > You'd have to install a 1.9 on > the host, and somehow tell it that it should compile .go files with the > endianness of the target. OK. Thanks, Ludo'.