From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: GNU Guile branch, master, updated. v2.1.0-163-g283ab48 Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 15:34:47 +0100 Message-ID: <87k42vxit4.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87ipifvn9j.fsf@netris.org> <87y5rbxxvi.fsf@pobox.com> <87pqcntbes.fsf@netris.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1331217316 6100 80.91.229.3 (8 Mar 2012 14:35:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 14:35:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Mark H Weaver Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 08 15:35:13 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S5eQy-0002Ic-8f for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 15:35:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42918 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5eQx-0005xH-Jf for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 09:35:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41103) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5eQq-0005fi-CB for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 09:35:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5eQj-0004jb-IW for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 09:35:03 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:35673 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5eQj-0004in-9s for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 09:34:57 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DCE0963A; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 09:34:51 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=MGuEmwUkXcmlDOj1z3EFIR7ewEU=; b=RLOJY5 6pOMyeZzS6P2LAvsVk2BNebp3xtHi7rjB6ASmCzC2+5c7hg8kd1M6WYFmixo63XV HGoFRCemoy4YER1gq1BME8EOLhYk4ssSAI0wZ7Uh5/2IobZMOGZtNVFr42zxjebz 6AwQXVWFbLj96Um8EuEtpM8qUY+fu/onfM9nU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=opiPe2opC95qWHt5KmUwP6RhoVOM9sRh F917JeyBqkdoRw9XZwumR9gdge5rSokid0rlIA7uxx7vLW8G50XXgyPLByrm/wkI s2TG3tOa16ZoiHiTE7tTFzwIQfveRYJjLL7MzVssftesc4nVSwVUv3mYSWYpZg/6 JVO5SHOz6kI= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E819639; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 09:34:51 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 688CE962C; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 09:34:50 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87pqcntbes.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Thu, 08 Mar 2012 09:28:11 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: DCBD8E82-692B-11E1-B6F9-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 74.115.168.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:14060 Archived-At: On Thu 08 Mar 2012 15:28, Mark H Weaver writes: >>> What's the anticipated use case for this? >> >> Parameterizing default prompts? It allows users to re-set the >> user/system process boundary for a dynamic extent. > > Okay, makes sense. Sorry for the bother. No problem. I don't have a deep understanding of how default prompts can / should be used. Something that needs some experience, I think. Regards, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/