From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Do you recognize these modules? Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 19:00:30 +0200 Message-ID: <87k40eg0k1.fsf@gnuvola.org> References: <87zk9r8p1s.fsf@gnuvola.org> <8762bz89zg.fsf@gnuvola.org> <87r4unszj2.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1337014781 21659 80.91.229.3 (14 May 2012 16:59:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 16:59:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 14 18:59:40 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1STycV-00036Q-0V for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 May 2012 18:59:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47575 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1STycT-0002fO-VO for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 May 2012 12:59:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47466) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1STycR-0002ew-Uc for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 May 2012 12:59:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1STycM-0007cu-P4 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 May 2012 12:59:35 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp207.alice.it ([82.57.200.103]:59243) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1STycK-0007cX-7B; Mon, 14 May 2012 12:59:28 -0400 Original-Received: from ambire (79.21.65.42) by smtp207.alice.it (8.6.023.02) id 4F05A6650EE464CE; Mon, 14 May 2012 18:59:25 +0200 Original-Received: from ttn by ambire with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1STydL-0000Ud-Qw; Mon, 14 May 2012 19:00:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87r4unszj2.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Mon, 14 May 2012 14:44:17 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 82.57.200.103 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:14420 Archived-At: () ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) () Mon, 14 May 2012 14:44:17 +0200 What do you think about copying the doc for these modules from 1.4 to 1.8/2.0? Would you be willing to transfer copyright to the FSF for that? Sure (see other reply to Noah). If Noah is OK to help with the actual transfer of the doc bits, then I guess we=E2=80=99re almost all set. :-) 1.4 snarfs comments from .scm files for interpolation in template files to create the final texinfo, but i'm almost certain you don't need/want that flow, but would rather have the final texinfo. Is that correct? Also, i can either add a file to branch_release-1-8 (exercising my regained write privs :-D), or post it. What's best?