From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Bug in documentation for eq? ? Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:17:16 +0200 Message-ID: <87k3z22kdf.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87vcimb70s.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87oboe2qti.fsf@pobox.com> <87r4tab4m6.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1340198265 14789 80.91.229.3 (20 Jun 2012 13:17:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:17:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 20 15:17:42 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ShKmz-0001mU-C4 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:17:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40735 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ShKmz-0002Ef-AC for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:17:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56253) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ShKmr-0002Du-Fe for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:17:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ShKml-0000OI-DE for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:17:33 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:39744 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ShKmh-0000MB-Li; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:17:23 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7AE6C6F0; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:17:19 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=V2GZzUYoYcLR9VAdzXXMpHjrrc8=; b=i1diyG GhwHCGwXmxXTP888SAjNsHcsDLUTwV2+6JZHMPK57YuOsA8tBAzhYRc0EuEdZdkv khBUhheCVVAI5p/aP7egr1kNRkm08KNekLBpLxCZQLt2jjA0RDWeRSJFKcjVAuel 21HWMOmnWqEcSQdmUR/HlVQvyvWCv4Nu2oXi4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=SpzL1nCosmnosW2goN3VzQ3k5P6vr4Jm 8XbCVuoGx9lGOnAXedfvlq/HkX5eqfQ7di+nNDhVV7kIG40shyeMgifAY07tFOQP 2J4GnypHmfwDEOuoLx3TNuWxaNV+dSgDN1VQUO5Irjrpo5JcA9LWjmpaUlsrU/uA v6Gpghq1/8M= Original-Received: from b-pb-sasl-sd. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF9B1C6EF; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:17:19 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [85.60.193.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 55AFAC6EE; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:17:19 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87r4tab4m6.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (David Kastrup's message of "Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:32:49 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 437032EC-BADA-11E1-9378-FA6787E41631-02397024!b-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 74.115.168.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:14644 Archived-At: Hi, [bunch of examples] > Which of the above would you consider unspecified? As the Scheme standard clearly states, all the ones comparing numbers with eq?. You find some of them surprising; that is your problem ;) The answer is to not compare numbers with eq?. Regards, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/