From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Christopher Allan Webber Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: GNU Guile 2.1.5 released (beta) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 20:03:04 -0600 Message-ID: <87k2azuxbb.fsf@dustycloud.org> References: <07F04476-6837-4DBD-A7FB-525F3660982C@gmail.com> <20161213012455.EKTND.4212.root@cdptpa-web08> <98CCD0B6-7D9F-4357-B217-E4534ECB3549@gmail.com> <077181FC-63B7-4DBC-9E53-DA0D2D915530@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1481940197 12000 195.159.176.226 (17 Dec 2016 02:03:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 02:03:17 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: mu4e 0.9.16; emacs 25.1.1 Cc: Andy Wingo , guile-devel@gnu.org To: Matt Wette Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 17 03:03:13 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cI4LA-0002K1-6n for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Dec 2016 03:03:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35049 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cI4LE-000746-M3 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 21:03:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33586) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cI4LA-00070d-Q5 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 21:03:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cI4L7-0007ct-O6 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 21:03:12 -0500 Original-Received: from dustycloud.org ([50.116.34.160]:46702) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cI4L7-0007c4-Jc for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 21:03:09 -0500 Original-Received: from oolong (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dustycloud.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA250267F6; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 21:03:04 -0500 (EST) In-reply-to: <077181FC-63B7-4DBC-9E53-DA0D2D915530@gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 50.116.34.160 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:18800 Archived-At: Matt Wette writes: >> On Dec 16, 2016, at 5:50 AM, Matt Wette wrote: >>=20 >> OK. This is gonna be hard to trace down. >>=20 >> I am on a Mac running Sierra, 10.12.2. At work I am running 10.9 I be= lieve, and I see the same behavior. >>=20 >>=20 >> If I compile with gcc 6.2 or gcc4.9, but no extra flags besides =E2=80= =94prefix, I get the following failure: >>=20 >> FAIL: numbers.test: string->number: valid complex number strings >>=20 >> and trace this down to=20 >>=20 >> meta/guile -c '(display (eqv? (imag-part (string->number "#i1@-0")) -0= .0))' =3D> #f > > I am now compiling with clang-3.9 and getting fatal errors. Stay tuned= =E2=80=A6 Is clang supported? I didn't think it was.