From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Release now? Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 13:13:45 -0600 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87isv5leom.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> References: <87of50tdcz.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <873cmbpyij.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <873cm9oe9k.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87r89tlf07.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1046373318 21593 80.91.224.249 (27 Feb 2003 19:15:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 19:15:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18oTUn-0005bG-00 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 20:15:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18oTUJ-00050n-08 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:14:35 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18oTTk-0004dS-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:14:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18oTTd-0004H4-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:13:54 -0500 Original-Received: from dsl093-098-016.wdc1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.98.16] helo=defaultvalue.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18oTTW-0003yV-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:13:46 -0500 Original-Received: from raven.i.defaultvalue.org (raven.i.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDFA713888; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 13:13:45 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by raven.i.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BCAFBD4E61; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 13:13:45 -0600 (CST) Original-To: Greg Troxel In-Reply-To: <87r89tlf07.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> (Rob Browning's message of "Thu, 27 Feb 2003 13:06:48 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2001 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2001 Rob Browning writes: > /usr/lib/libguile-foo-bar.la.2.4.1 > > so that ltdl can find the right one, we may not be able to use the > strategy for the .so's above... Though thinking further, maybe this is only a problem for libguile, and people are a lot less likely to want to dynamic-link specific versions of that, though that doesn't mean they'll never need to. Putting the guile version in the lib name would fix that too, but I think there's still a reasonably strong sentiment against libguile-12-gwrap-glib-2-gl-3-whatever-4. I guess the right way to start is still probably to see if we can fix libtool and/or libguile-ltdl, and if so, that'll change the range of available options... -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org Previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel