From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: GMP bignum results using double cells. Date: 01 Mar 2003 14:43:03 +0100 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87isv342zc.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> References: <878yw3o8rd.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87k7fl6e69.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <8765r5oesl.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87u1epmynv.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <874r6p62h3.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87lm01mwv1.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1046526226 26543 80.91.224.249 (1 Mar 2003 13:43:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 13:43:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18p7HE-0006tp-00 for ; Sat, 01 Mar 2003 14:43:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18p7H4-0000Ix-03 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2003 08:43:34 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18p7Gi-0000Ir-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2003 08:43:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18p7Gh-0000If-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2003 08:43:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.dokom.net ([195.253.8.218]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18p7Gg-0000GQ-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2003 08:43:10 -0500 Original-Received: from dialin.speedway43.dip119.dokom.de ([195.138.43.119] helo=zagadka.ping.de) by mail.dokom.net with smtp (Exim 3.36 #3) id 18p7Gu-0001qW-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2003 14:43:24 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 5922 invoked by uid 1000); 1 Mar 2003 13:43:03 -0000 Original-To: Rob Browning In-Reply-To: <87lm01mwv1.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> Original-Lines: 15 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2012 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2012 Rob Browning writes: > Marius Vollmer writes: > > > Could we put it into an 'internal' header file that is not being > > installed? > > Sure. I'm favorably disposed toward 'private' C headers. I'd just > thought that the general consensus was against them. Yep, you are right, I think. Is it a big problem to include gmp.h in numbers.h, anyway? I'd say we can just do it. -- GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel