From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Summary of config.h variables and questions. Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 23:24:06 -0600 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87isuvsqa1.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> References: <87znoal646.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87of4okuxf.fsf@zip.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1047014677 10047 80.91.224.249 (7 Mar 2003 05:24:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 05:24:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 07 06:24:35 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18rALS-0002bn-00 for ; Fri, 07 Mar 2003 06:24:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18rALM-0006te-06 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2003 00:24:28 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18rAL3-0006pZ-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2003 00:24:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18rAL2-0006oJ-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2003 00:24:09 -0500 Original-Received: from dsl093-098-016.wdc1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.98.16] helo=defaultvalue.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18rAL1-0006l3-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2003 00:24:08 -0500 Original-Received: from raven.i.defaultvalue.org (raven.i.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B646765E4; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 23:24:06 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by raven.i.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E289FD9797; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 23:24:06 -0600 (CST) Original-To: Kevin Ryde In-Reply-To: <87of4okuxf.fsf@zip.com.au> (Kevin Ryde's message of "Fri, 07 Mar 2003 08:10:52 +1000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2042 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2042 Kevin Ryde writes: > It's worth bearing in mind that const and inline are aspects of the > compiler, so ideally they'd be determined based on #ifdefs, allowing > an application to be built with a different compiler than guile was > compiled with. The way I've currently reworked it is so that we define SCM_C_INLINE (we can use another name if people don't like that one) to be whatever autoconf figures out for the "correct" inline term, if it finds one at all. AC_C_INLINE tests for inline, __inline, and _inline. Apparently this covers some range of compilers... -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org Previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel