From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel,gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: r5rs pitfall test Date: 03 May 2003 22:01:35 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87issrdckg.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> References: <20030213150507.394a936c.dsmith@altustech.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1051992131 25166 80.91.224.249 (3 May 2003 20:02:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 May 2003 20:02:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 03 22:02:10 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19C3Cz-0006Xl-00 for ; Sat, 03 May 2003 22:02:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 19C3Dr-0001oi-01 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 May 2003 16:03:03 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 19C3D1-0001EQ-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 May 2003 16:02:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 19C3Cm-00014Z-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 May 2003 16:01:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.dokom.net ([195.253.8.218]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 19C3Cl-00013i-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 May 2003 16:01:55 -0400 Original-Received: from dialin.speedway43.dip236.dokom.de ([195.138.43.236] helo=zagadka.ping.de) by mail.dokom.net with smtp (Exim 3.36 #3) id 19C3E8-000539-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 May 2003 22:03:20 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 9686 invoked by uid 1000); 3 May 2003 20:01:35 -0000 Original-To: "Dale P. Smith" In-Reply-To: <20030213150507.394a936c.dsmith@altustech.com> Original-Lines: 21 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 Original-cc: bug-guile@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2247 gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:776 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2247 [You'd never think you get an answer this late, right? ;-] "Dale P. Smith" writes: > I saw this on comp.lang.scheme and thought I'd try it out: > > http://sisc.sourceforge.net/r5rspitresults.html Thanks! I added these tests to the HEAD test suite. > Guile fails tests 1.1 and 2.1 I didn't fix these bugs right away since I didn't understand 1.1 right away and 2.1 is relatively hard to fix, given the internal structure of our evaluator. I'd say 2.1 (at least) isn't very important to fix, tho. If anyone feels motivated... :-) -- GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel