From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Ryde Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: srfi-1 count Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 07:31:25 +1000 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87iskyoqj6.fsf@zip.com.au> References: <87oev1v2pd.fsf@zip.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1070407082 9787 80.91.224.253 (2 Dec 2003 23:18:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 23:18:02 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 03 00:18:00 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1ARJmJ-0008Ki-00 for ; Wed, 03 Dec 2003 00:17:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1ARKYG-0006Ic-PF for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 19:07:32 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1ARJ82-0003Ld-FR for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 17:36:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1ARJ5x-0002gX-Sw for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 17:34:44 -0500 Original-Received: from [61.8.0.36] (helo=snoopy.pacific.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1ARJ4q-0002P5-4T for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 17:33:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mongrel.pacific.net.au (mongrel.pacific.net.au [61.8.0.107]) by snoopy.pacific.net.au (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id hB2LVbno012450 for ; Wed, 3 Dec 2003 08:31:37 +1100 Original-Received: from localhost (ppp144.dyn11.pacific.net.au [61.8.11.144]) by mongrel.pacific.net.au (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id hB2LVaxs019025 for ; Wed, 3 Dec 2003 08:31:36 +1100 Original-Received: from gg by localhost with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1ARI7C-00037Y-00; Wed, 03 Dec 2003 07:31:26 +1000 Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: (Stephen Compall's message of "25 Nov 2003 12:05:25 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3104 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3104 Stephen Compall writes: > > Perhaps "non-@code{#f}" instead of "true"? I think "true" reads best. > Or is this a convention in the manual? The "Booleans" node notes it, maybe an index entry for "True" if you think it could be hard to find. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel