From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] `any' and `every' in `(oop goops util)' Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:45:13 +0200 Organization: LAAS-CNRS Message-ID: <87irvnmk8m.fsf@laas.fr> References: <87psq0pmyy.fsf@laas.fr> <87oe5k9dj1.fsf@zip.com.au> <87u0fbfgoe.fsf@laas.fr> <87pspybo6a.fsf@zip.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1130146190 2679 80.91.229.2 (24 Oct 2005 09:29:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:29:50 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 24 11:29:43 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ETyco-0006X6-Tz for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 11:28:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ETy0n-0006MM-MG for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 04:48:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ETx4z-0002vO-6m for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 03:49:13 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ETx4x-0002ur-7e for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 03:49:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ETx4x-0002um-3l for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 03:49:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.93.0.15] (helo=laas.laas.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1ETx4x-0005Yt-5H for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 03:49:11 -0400 Original-Received: by laas.laas.fr (8.13.1/8.13.4) with SMTP id j9O7n5Yk003161; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:49:05 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org X-URL: http://www.laas.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 3 Brumaire an 214 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEB1F5364 X-PGP-Key: http://www.laas.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu Mail-Followup-To: guile-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87pspybo6a.fsf@zip.com.au> (Kevin Ryde's message of "Sat, 22 Oct 2005 06:38:53 +1000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: 0.496 () MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang at CNRS-LAAS X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5351 Archived-At: Hi, Kevin Ryde writes: > If you're not supposed to use it then any warnings it provokes when > you do aren't a big deal :). Right. ;-) > Now that srfi-1 has a lot more C code it's probably worth using for > performance. Yes, that's the point I was trying to make: this module had better use SRFI-1 as much as possible (also for maintainability and consistency reasons). Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel