From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: SCM_DEFER_INTS in 1.6 Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 10:30:40 +0200 Organization: LAAS-CNRS Message-ID: <87irooeslr.fsf@laas.fr> References: <8764l2iivf.fsf@zip.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1146558657 12240 80.91.229.2 (2 May 2006 08:30:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 08:30:57 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 02 10:30:55 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FaqHQ-0007tO-QK for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 May 2006 10:30:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FaqHQ-0004VC-7S for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 May 2006 04:30:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FaqHN-0004US-Cr for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 May 2006 04:30:45 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FaqHL-0004UG-UK for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 May 2006 04:30:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FaqHL-0004UD-Qu for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 May 2006 04:30:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.93.0.15] (helo=laas.laas.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FaqHS-0005bR-PO for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 May 2006 04:30:51 -0400 Original-Received: by laas.laas.fr (8.13.6/8.13.4) with SMTP id k428UeJ6015291; Tue, 2 May 2006 10:30:42 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org X-URL: http://www.laas.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 13 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Flor=E9al?= an 214 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEB1F5364 X-PGP-Key: http://www.laas.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu Mail-Followup-To: guile-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <8764l2iivf.fsf@zip.com.au> (Kevin Ryde's message of "Sat, 22 Apr 2006 09:55:32 +1000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: 0.496 () MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang at CNRS-LAAS X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5895 Archived-At: Hi, Kevin Ryde writes: > I'm wondering if the right thing would be just to drop the > SCM_DEFER_INTS from the guile-gtk generated code. (The code there may > still want a mutex then, but that's a gtk/gdk matter, unrelated to > what guile might or might not need.) I think what you see gets generated by G-Wrap. Whatever `SCM_DEFER_INTS' actually does, I can't see any reason why G-Wrap should issue it as it does, and I've been tempted to remove it from there. I don't think it even needs to be replaced by a mutex or some such. So I think we should just happily remove it (from G-Wrap-generated code) and see what happens! ;-) Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel