From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Ryde Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: ftw visited ino+devno Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 08:45:28 +1000 Message-ID: <87irizu2d3.fsf@zip.com.au> References: <87mz8bu3xf.fsf@zip.com.au> <87ejtn3e5v.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1160001972 23774 80.91.229.2 (4 Oct 2006 22:46:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 22:46:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 05 00:46:08 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GVFUz-0001It-Jj for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 00:45:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GVFUz-0003PA-7p for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Oct 2006 18:45:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GVFUv-0003Op-CS for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Oct 2006 18:45:53 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GVFUs-0003NY-Ry for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Oct 2006 18:45:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GVFUs-0003NV-Jq for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Oct 2006 18:45:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [61.8.2.229] (helo=mailout2.pacific.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GVFbO-0000yV-Rv for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Oct 2006 18:52:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (mailproxy1.pacific.net.au [61.8.2.162]) by mailout2.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35FBA10B3A1; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 08:45:47 +1000 (EST) Original-Received: from localhost (ppp2A18.dyn.pacific.net.au [61.8.42.24]) by mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge3) with ESMTP id k94MjkPQ031952; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 08:45:46 +1000 Original-Received: from gg by localhost with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GVFUW-0003g5-3j; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 08:45:28 +1000 Original-To: Neil Jerram Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: <87ejtn3e5v.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Wed, 04 Oct 2006 23:32:44 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:6136 Archived-At: Neil Jerram writes: > > Is it worth commenting that the use of dev+ino (as opposed to > pathname) avoids traversing hard links (notably . and ..) multiple > times, or is that too obvious? Yep, that's noted in the manual. Personally I'd think seeing linked files multiple times in a tree walk might actually be a good thing sometimes. But I'm not going to change the design. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel