From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Text collation Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 14:39:59 +0100 Organization: LAAS-CNRS Message-ID: <87irhne7yo.fsf@laas.fr> References: <877j00cirs.fsf@laas.fr> <87hcz3mqhr.fsf@zip.com.au> <87r6x0qjyy.fsf@laas.fr> <877iyrbxj7.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org> <87wt6rxy6z.fsf@laas.fr> <87ac3m2joj.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org> <87slhclsj9.fsf@laas.fr> <87mz7kokad.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org> <87ods0tf1m.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87odrz31ld.fsf@laas.fr> <873b8tm5d0.fsf@laas.fr> <87k624ldm4.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1163166189 31410 80.91.229.2 (10 Nov 2006 13:43:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:43:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Guile-Devel , Neil Jerram Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 10 14:43:06 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GiWeg-0001QQ-Ok for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 14:42:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GiWeg-0003q4-7J for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 08:42:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GiWec-0003o4-9O for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 08:42:46 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GiWea-0003nW-NI for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 08:42:45 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GiWea-0003nP-IH for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 08:42:44 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.93.0.15] (helo=laas.laas.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.52) id 1GiWea-0006SZ-CS for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 08:42:44 -0500 Original-Received: from messiaen.laas.fr (messiaen [IPv6:2001:660:6602:0:230:65ff:fed4:9d20]) by laas.laas.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kAADgY62024102; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 14:42:34 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: by messiaen.laas.fr (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 10 Nov 2006 14:39:59 +0100 Original-To: Rob Browning X-URL: http://www.laas.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 20 Brumaire an 215 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEB1F5364 X-PGP-Key: http://www.laas.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu Mail-Followup-To: Rob Browning , Neil Jerram , Guile-Devel In-Reply-To: <87k624ldm4.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org> (Rob Browning's message of "Thu, 09 Nov 2006 09:43:47 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -0.001 () NO_RELAYS X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang at CNRS-LAAS on IPv6:2001:660:6602::2 X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by laas.laas.fr id kAADgY62024102 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:6213 Archived-At: Hi, Rob Browning writes: > ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic Court=E8s) writes: > >> If nobody disagrees, I would like to merge `(ice-9 i18n)' in HEAD >> and 1.8 within a few days "as is" (that is, using a separate shared >> library and without documenting the C functions, as discussed >> earlier). > > I don't have a strong feeling about the shared library issue as long > as none of the versioning requirements are broken. However, I'm still > opposed to the addition of new scm_ functions that aren't intended to > be public, but don't use the scm_i_ prefix. Fair enough. Then I think I'll do the following: 1. Keep the shared library (named `libguile-i18n-v-0' in the next 1.8 release). 2. Document its existence as well as the C functions. I think it's a better plan than renaming the C functions to `scm_i_'. Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel