From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Serious bug inn GUILE rational handling Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 02:52:43 +0000 Message-ID: <87irfvqupw.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <20061224112539.M19482@ccrma.Stanford.EDU> NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1167360781 2501 80.91.229.10 (29 Dec 2006 02:53:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 02:53:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 29 03:52:59 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H07ra-0001Ed-Pj for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 03:52:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H07ra-0001PW-CF for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:52:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H07rX-0001PH-4Z for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:52:51 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H07rT-0001MP-MM for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:52:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H07rT-0001M5-Fk for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:52:47 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.84.72.33] (helo=mail3.uklinux.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H07rS-0002VW-U1 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:52:47 -0500 Original-Received: from laruns (host86-145-157-83.range86-145.btcentralplus.com [86.145.157.83]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE1B40A652; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 02:52:46 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from laruns (laruns [127.0.0.1]) by laruns (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9D3E6F711; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 02:52:43 +0000 (GMT) Original-To: "Bill Schottstaedt" In-Reply-To: <20061224112539.M19482@ccrma.Stanford.EDU> (Bill Schottstaedt's message of "Sun, 24 Dec 2006 03:32:41 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:6375 Archived-At: "Bill Schottstaedt" writes: > in the check for cell type equality in scm_equalp. I would hesitate > to remove support for this bit because it will mean you get gcd > on every integer divide! The current system already slows Guile > down by about 10%. Just to check: by "the current system" do you mean CVS after Han-Wen's fix? It would be good if you could post benchmark code for this. It may be that looking at that code would suggest a way of improving the fix. Regards, Neil _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel