From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: autohackery and nightly snapshots Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 20:15:22 +0000 Message-ID: <87irdo7k11.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <87ejoj5h91.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87vehu7d1j.fsf@laas.fr> <87hcte0zdg.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87tzxbcgz8.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87irdp3lkx.fsf@zip.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172520981 28304 80.91.229.12 (26 Feb 2007 20:16:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 20:16:21 +0000 (UTC) To: Guile Development Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 26 21:16:15 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HLmGb-0003nU-Fa for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 21:16:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HLmGa-0001lX-Vc for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:16:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HLmFw-0001MM-RU for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:15:32 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HLmFv-0001K0-0r for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:15:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HLmFu-0001Jk-Mw for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:15:30 -0500 Original-Received: from mail3.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.33]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HLmFu-0002OL-Bw for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:15:30 -0500 Original-Received: from laruns (host217-43-47-35.range217-43.btcentralplus.com [217.43.47.35]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E084540A502 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 20:15:29 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from laruns (laruns [127.0.0.1]) by laruns (Postfix) with ESMTP id AECBE6F70D for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 20:15:22 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: <87irdp3lkx.fsf@zip.com.au> (Kevin Ryde's message of "Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:43:10 +1100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:6568 Archived-At: Kevin Ryde writes: > Neil Jerram writes: >> >> I noticed from strace (below) that, on my machine, ltdl tries to open >> libguile-i18n-v-0.so from libguile/.libs, once it has failed with the >> locations in LTDL_LIBRARY_PATH. I'm guessing that this is a piece of >> fallback "try to open .so in the same directory as the running >> executable" logic, and that this logic wasn't present in some older >> version of libtool. (Although there is nothing in libtool's NEWS or >> doc to support this.) > > There's a comment that it tries the name as given, like just "foo.la" > etc. Probably not what you normally want :(. Where are you seeing that, in the manual or in the libltdl code? _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel