From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Inlining `scm_getc ()' and friends Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:32:46 +0200 Message-ID: <87iqygq3td.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87iqyk9z9z.fsf@gnu.org> <87od8a4vfg.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87fxtm1ak3.fsf@gnu.org> <87ve2ho7ya.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208421354 20191 80.91.229.12 (17 Apr 2008 08:35:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:35:54 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 17 10:36:25 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JmPbN-0004ty-6R for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:36:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JmPai-0008Bq-6d for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 04:35:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JmPYF-000795-5k for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 04:33:03 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JmPYD-000783-6C for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 04:33:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JmPYC-00077x-PO for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 04:33:00 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JmPYC-00036k-9t for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 04:33:00 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JmPY6-000063-JK for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:32:54 +0000 Original-Received: from 193.50.110.168 ([193.50.110.168]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:32:54 +0000 Original-Received: from ludo by 193.50.110.168 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:32:54 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 20 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.50.110.168 X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 29 Germinal an 216 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEB1F5364 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: i686-pc-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:1NG7Rp065aa3XOC01hPsfYsVSMc= X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:7172 Archived-At: Hi Neil! Neil Jerram writes: > But why not commit the benchmark code anyway? If there are some > benchmarks there worth running, the more incentive for someone (me?) > to clean up the framework code! You managed to make me change my mind and I just committed `read.bm'. ;-) Actually the benchmark suite works pretty well, it's just that one has to use the top-level `benchmark-guile' instead of `benchmark-suite/guile-benchmark'. I think you're right: it's a good idea to put small benchmarks there rather than post code snippets to the list that eventually get lost. Thanks, Ludo'.