From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: my load path bug Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 21:11:26 +0200 Message-ID: <87iqekig0x.fsf@gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1255374743 28349 80.91.229.12 (12 Oct 2009 19:12:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:12:23 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 12 21:12:12 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MxQJU-0002KX-8j for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 21:12:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53374 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MxQJT-00006A-Hr for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:12:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MxQJM-00005w-Ki for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:12:00 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MxQJI-00005T-0u for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:12:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46783 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MxQJH-00005Q-VC for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:11:55 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:49112) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MxQJH-00048F-5y for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:11:55 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1MxQJD-0002CC-Ds for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 21:11:51 +0200 Original-Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 21:11:51 +0200 Original-Received: from ludo by reverse-83.fdn.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 21:11:51 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 34 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: reverse-83.fdn.fr X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 21 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Vend=E9miaire?= an 218 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:4sLi7aihG4ci0uJL6LXJtdLR+D0= X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9478 Archived-At: Hi Ken, Ken Raeburn writes: > Andy's patch (eb35012) adds $pkglibdir to the path searched for > libraries. That directory is $prefix/lib/guile; it contains a > subdirectory "1.9" and nothing else. The libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-4.* > libraries guile searches for at startup are in $prefix/lib aka > $libdir. > > Changing SCM_LIB_DIR to be defined as $libdir instead of $pkglibdir is > easy enough, if the current location is where we want those > libraries. Yes, I think that’s the way to go, since libguile-srfi-*, libguilereadline*, etc. get installed to $(libdir), not $(pkglibdir). If nobody objects, please commit it. > Do we need programs to be able to link against them directly? Yes since people may be explicitly linking against them (they’ve always been under $(libdir)). > Do we need non-guile programs to be able to find them with dlopen? Yes. > (Is it too late to consider changing it?) Yes. Thanks, Ludo’.