From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: bdw-gc includes in libguile.h Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 18:15:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87ipv08u00.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87hbardqgw.fsf@gnu.org> <874o6ovbsa.fsf@gnu.org> <87hbangie2.fsf@gnu.org> <87k4fjf06o.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301501753 1101 80.91.229.12 (30 Mar 2011 16:15:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:15:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 30 18:15:48 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4y3e-0007xb-17 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 18:15:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43701 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q4y3d-0005sI-4m for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:15:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53619 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q4y3O-0005r9-RQ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:15:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4y3N-0000YE-H0 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:15:30 -0400 Original-Received: from solo.fdn.fr ([80.67.169.19]:40188) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4y3N-0000Y5-CW for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 12:15:29 -0400 Original-Received: from nixey (unknown [193.50.110.208]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: lcourtes) by smtp.fdn.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C2984507E; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 18:15:28 +0200 (CEST) X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 10 Germinal an 219 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: (Andy Wingo's message of "Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:16:54 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110013 (No Gnus v0.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 80.67.169.19 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:12088 Archived-At: Hello! Andy Wingo writes: > On Mon 28 Mar 2011 22:40, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > >>>> 1. Disable pthread redirects and instead register threads explicitly >>>> (in =E2=80=98scm_with_guile=E2=80=99). >>> >>> Why is this only applicable to 2.1 ? >> >> I was thinking it=E2=80=99d break the ABI, but maybe not? > > I don't think it does break ABI. We are always free to redefine C > macros, provided that binaries compiled against the old macros still > work as well as they did. Given that we require threads to enter Guile > with a scm_with_guile, there is no problem here, I don't think. OK, then fine with me. Thanks for persevering! ;-) Ludo=E2=80=99.