From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel,gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: anyone define port types? Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:18:12 +0200 Organization: AvatarAcademy.nl Message-ID: <87io046wp7.fsf@drakenvlieg.flower> References: <87y492mnjp.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1459336736 5434 80.91.229.3 (30 Mar 2016 11:18:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:18:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andy Wingo , "guile-user@gnu.org" , guile-devel To: Panicz Maciej Godek Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 30 13:18:44 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1alE95-0002oV-KP for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 13:18:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53173 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1alE92-0001aI-UG for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:18:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36740) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1alE8v-0001aA-79 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:18:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1alE8s-0005AM-1W for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:18:33 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:57598) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1alE8e-00058c-Kp; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:18:16 -0400 Original-Received: from peder.onsbrabantnet.nl ([88.159.206.46]:57078 helo=drakenvlieg.flower.peder.onsbrabantnet.nl) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1alE8d-0005zP-Mh; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 07:18:16 -0400 X-Url: http://AvatarAcademy.nl In-Reply-To: (Panicz Maciej Godek's message of "Wed, 30 Mar 2016 08:29:10 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:18253 gmane.lisp.guile.user:12525 Archived-At: Panicz Maciej Godek writes: > I also used GOOPS, which I regret to this day, and so the > whole framework needs a serious rewrite What is it that you do not like about GOOPS? I have a project that may be in the same position. I used GOOPS initially, then rewrote it to use either GOOPS, plain lists or records backends. When I kind of decided to go for plain lists, I discovered people (eg, guix) are using records; and meanwhile Andy has made GOOPS perform. Now I'm thinking: if you only use GOOPS as a friendlier way to create records, that may be nice after all. Just wondering. Greetings, Jan --=20 Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar=C2=AE http://AvatarAcademy.nl= =20=20