From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Handling BUGS. Date: 24 Mar 2002 23:00:10 +0100 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87hen5zkwl.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> References: <87g02t4zgn.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87lmcko60l.fsf@tyrell.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> <87elic8k8e.fsf@tyrell.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> <87r8mcgx4m.fsf@gaff.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> <87n0x01bci.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87u1r77a7c.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87wuw2gk81.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87n0wxzol5.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <874rj54ql4.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1017008036 11655 127.0.0.1 (24 Mar 2002 22:13:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 22:13:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ttn@glug.org, evan@glug.org, guile-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16pGFO-00031s-00 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2002 23:13:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16pG2D-000431-00; Sun, 24 Mar 2002 17:00:17 -0500 Original-Received: from dialin.speedway42.dip34.dokom.de ([195.138.42.34] helo=zagadka.ping.de) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16pFzl-0003y2-00 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2002 16:57:45 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 1179 invoked by uid 1000); 24 Mar 2002 22:00:10 -0000 Original-To: Rob Browning In-Reply-To: <874rj54ql4.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> Original-Lines: 29 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:184 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:184 Rob Browning writes: > On second thought, I completely agree that just having one set of > files is a better idea, though if the bugs database keeps growing, we > might need to archive older stuff at some point -- that's all I was > really thinking of. However there are probably much better ways to > handle that. When we have a mass of bugs in the data base, we'll probably also have good tools to browse them. Just looking at them with 'ls' wont scale, but we don't need to do that. > However I *am* a little hesitant about the free-form bug/file-names, > but since I'm having trouble figuring out exactly why that worries > me, we'll just ignore me for now :> What worries me slightly is that in a listing like README autoconf-woes autoconf-woes-2 bug-0 bug-1 bug-2 no-bugs-database ... it might not be apparent that all files describe bugs, not just the "bug-*" ones. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel