From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Guile CVS Build Problems (was: Re: What can I do to help? (conclusions)) Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 10:30:53 -0500 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87hefviq8i.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> References: <20021004132911.GD20754@www> <87k7ky5ggq.fsf@alice.rotty.yi.org> <20021006170804.GA7206@www> <87ofa71nfh.fsf@alice.rotty.yi.org> <87hefzjgng.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87d6qmvd1k.fsf@alice.rotty.yi.org> <87bs66ie3e.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87ptumz5c4.fsf_-_@alice.rotty.yi.org> <87k7kstthf.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <871y703v1g.fsf@alice.rotty.yi.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1034177589 21599 127.0.0.1 (9 Oct 2002 15:33:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 15:33:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17zIpf-0005c3-00 for ; Wed, 09 Oct 2002 17:33:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17zIpf-0004UM-00; Wed, 09 Oct 2002 11:33:07 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17zIoz-0003z1-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2002 11:32:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17zIox-0003yE-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2002 11:32:24 -0400 Original-Received: from n66644228.ipcdsl.net ([66.64.4.228] helo=defaultvalue.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17zInW-00035U-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Oct 2002 11:30:54 -0400 Original-Received: from raven.i.defaultvalue.org (raven.i.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7542E1D4F; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 10:30:53 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by raven.i.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2C7131250; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 10:30:53 -0500 (CDT) Original-To: Andreas Rottmann In-Reply-To: <871y703v1g.fsf@alice.rotty.yi.org> (Andreas Rottmann's message of "09 Oct 2002 09:56:11 +0200") Original-Lines: 25 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1490 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1490 Andreas Rottmann writes: > No, I don't even use that macro. The problem is, AFACIT, this code in > guile-ltdl.c: > > void > scm_lt_dlset_preloaded_symbols (void) > { > extern const lt_dlsymlist lt_preloaded_symbols[]; > lt_dlpreload_default(lt_preloaded_symbols); > } If it helps someone track this down before I have a chance to look in to it, that code is just a copy/paste expansion of the macro that used to be in the same location where this new function (scm_lt_dlset_preloaded_symbols) is called (I think in guile.c). We used to call LT_DLSET_PRELOADED_SYMBOLS (), which expands into the two lines above. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org Previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C 64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel