From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Ryde Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: i18n, gettext support? Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 11:17:48 +1000 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87hdqyboar.fsf@zip.com.au> References: <878ycflchx.fsf@peder.flower> <87vffh7su9.fsf@ivanova.rotty.yi.org> <87657g61z5.fsf@ivanova.rotty.yi.org> <87smakdjbr.fsf@zip.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1092964709 452 80.91.224.253 (20 Aug 2004 01:18:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 01:18:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andreas Rottmann , guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 20 03:18:20 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bxy2u-0004Cj-00 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 03:18:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Bxy7B-0001Cl-GN for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 21:22:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Bxy78-0001CW-Ib for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 21:22:42 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Bxy76-0001CK-RW for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 21:22:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Bxy76-0001CH-MX for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 21:22:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [61.8.0.84] (helo=mailout1.pacific.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bxy2d-00056d-TV for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Aug 2004 21:18:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mailproxy2.pacific.net.au (mailproxy2.pacific.net.au [61.8.0.87]) by mailout1.pacific.net.au (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id i7K1Hx4u028298; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 11:17:59 +1000 Original-Received: from localhost (ppp2529.dyn.pacific.net.au [61.8.37.41]) by mailproxy2.pacific.net.au (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id i7K1Hv78032745; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 11:17:58 +1000 Original-Received: from gg by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bxy2P-0000KZ-00; Fri, 20 Aug 2004 11:17:49 +1000 Original-To: Matthias Koeppe Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: (Matthias Koeppe's message of "Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:07:26 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3986 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:3986 Matthias Koeppe writes: > > | However, it is permissible for one or more > | args to remain unprocessed by a directive; such args are ignored. I must have misread that bit. Or didn't read it properly and assumed the code knew what it was doing. > So maybe the check for superfluous arguments should be disabled in > Guile (whether ~@* is used or not). Sounds fair. CL is the model for this stuff, there's nothing gained by deviating from it for no particular reason. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel