From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Preparing for a 1.6.8 release. Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 15:59:13 -0700 Message-ID: <87hdbdnmf2.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> References: <200510192231.PAA27954@hpsje.cup.hp.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1129762894 1724 80.91.229.2 (19 Oct 2005 23:01:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 23:01:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 20 01:01:26 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ESMuI-0004K0-Vv for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 00:59:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ESMuI-0002fw-ET for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:59:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ESMty-0002Uz-3N for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:59:18 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ESMtw-0002Tu-Au for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:59:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ESMtv-0002Tn-IF for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:59:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [70.85.129.156] (helo=defaultvalue.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ESMtv-000392-SN for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:59:15 -0400 Original-Received: from omen.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD21390D36; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 17:59:14 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (omen.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.1]) by omen.defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C9F540F3; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 15:59:14 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 55F5A410B7; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 15:59:13 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: Steve Ellcey In-Reply-To: <200510192231.PAA27954@hpsje.cup.hp.com> (Steve Ellcey's message of "Wed, 19 Oct 2005 15:31:11 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5320 Archived-At: Steve Ellcey writes: > Well the test for IA64 and not HP-UX would be "defined(__ia64) && > !defined(__hpux)". __hpux and __ia64 are defined by both the HP > compilers and GCC on IA64 HP-UX. __hpux__ and __ia64__ are only defined > by GCC. IA64 Linux GCC defines __ia64 and __ia64__ but not any of the > hpux macros. So what code should be used on HP-UX? Should the code in gc_os_dep.c that's currently guarded by IA64 be enabled or not, and should gc.c and continuations.c be doing something different for HP-UX, or nothing at all? Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel