From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Guile 1.7.91 has been released. Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:39:44 +0200 Message-ID: <87hd71zq4f.fsf@zagadka.de> References: <87y80gyxrq.fsf@zagadka.de> <87zmkvmw7s.fsf@laas.fr> <87pslryr5n.fsf@zagadka.de> <87irrixpkj.fsf@laas.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1139956647 6934 80.91.229.2 (14 Feb 2006 22:37:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:37:27 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 14 23:37:26 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F98nP-0003AH-Lj for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:37:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F98nO-00014L-5s for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:37:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F961n-00081H-8S for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:39:59 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F961l-0007xR-0G for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:39:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F961k-0007xN-U8 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:39:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [213.243.153.36] (helo=smtp3.pp.htv.fi) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F966U-0008EC-QY for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:44:51 -0500 Original-Received: from zagadka.ping.de (cs181072157.pp.htv.fi [82.181.72.157]) by smtp3.pp.htv.fi (Postfix) with SMTP id 1126E27AC35 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:39:56 +0200 (EET) Original-Received: (qmail 20632 invoked by uid 1000); 14 Feb 2006 21:39:44 +0200 Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87irrixpkj.fsf@laas.fr> (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s's?= message of "Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:22:20 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5705 Archived-At: ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic Court=E8s) writes: >> Well, they get to choose both texts that have a MD5 collision. >> Looking at the PostScript source reveals that the texts have been >> rigged, which should be enough if this goes to court. In our case, an >> attacker would need to find a second meaningful text that collides >> with the text that we provide. I guess that is much harder to do. > > Well, since *you* are malicious, you could very well have prepared a > second tarball whose MD5 is the same and which you will propagate > during the days following the announcement. ;-) Ahh, that never occured to me... I don't tend to think of _me_ as the bad guy.. :-) --=20 GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel