Re: Exposing `scm_i_mem2number ()'

[ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic Courtès)]

Hi,

About `scm_c_locale_string_to_number ()'...

ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

> While writing it, it occurred to me that R5RS does not make it clear
> whether `string->number' converts from a number's external
> representation or not.

As discussed in [0], while R5RS does not explicitly state that
`string->number' converts from a number's external representation, it
makes a connection with `number->string' which in turn explicitly
converts to a number's external representation:

  - procedure: number->string z
  - procedure: number->string z radix
      RADIX must be an exact integer, either 2, 8, 10, or 16.  If
      omitted, RADIX defaults to 10.  The procedure `number->string'
      takes a number and a radix and returns as a string an external
      representation of the given number in the given radix such that

      (let ((number NUMBER)
            (radix RADIX))
        (eqv? number
              (string->number (number->string number
                                              radix)
                              radix)))

      is true.  It is an error if no possible result makes this
      expression true.

So the additional bit of documentation I suggested in my previous post
(stating that `locale' in `scm_c_locale_string_to_number ()' has nothing
to do with the number representation) is acceptable.

Can someone comment on it or commit it?

Thanks,
Ludovic.

[0] http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.scheme/tree/browse_frm/thread/dc6a98bbc7cda398/7490c0724e5eb305?rnum=1&hl=eo&q=string-%3Enumber+group%3Acomp.lang.scheme&_done=%2Fgroup%2Fcomp.lang.scheme%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2Fdc6a98bbc7cda398%2F5de6eb2de0105bdb%3Flnk%3Dst%26q%3Dstring-%3Enumber+group%3Acomp.lang.scheme%26rnum%3D1%26hl%3Deo%26#doc_13b48a9567f63165


_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel