From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: ptob object scm_t_bits vs long Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 23:00:10 +0300 Message-ID: <87hd38k3ed.fsf@zagadka.de> References: <873bgfr6xe.fsf@zip.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1148932822 16209 80.91.229.2 (29 May 2006 20:00:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 20:00:22 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 29 22:00:20 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FknuV-0007W5-Fx for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 May 2006 22:00:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FknuV-0005yp-47 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 May 2006 16:00:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FknuR-0005w4-AF for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 May 2006 16:00:15 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FknuP-0005v7-R3 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 May 2006 16:00:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FknuP-0005v4-MV for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 May 2006 16:00:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [213.243.153.36] (helo=smtp3.pp.htv.fi) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Fko02-0001Lb-T0 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 May 2006 16:06:03 -0400 Original-Received: from zagadka.ping.de (cs181072157.pp.htv.fi [82.181.72.157]) by smtp3.pp.htv.fi (Postfix) with SMTP id 9CF3D27ACBA for ; Mon, 29 May 2006 23:00:12 +0300 (EEST) Original-Received: (qmail 7728 invoked by uid 1000); 29 May 2006 23:00:11 +0300 Original-To: guile-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <873bgfr6xe.fsf@zip.com.au> (Kevin Ryde's message of "Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:58:21 +1000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5942 Archived-At: Kevin Ryde writes: > scm_make_port_type returns scm_t_bits, but the various setting > functions like scm_set_port_mark take a long. Should they be > scm_t_bits too? Yes. Good catch. If you are motivated, you might think about cleaning up and documenting the ports API... but on the other hand, that should maybe wait until we have Unicode support sorted out. -- GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel