From: ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic Courtès)
To: "Kjetil S. Matheussen" <k.s.matheussen@notam02.no>
Cc: Bill Schottstaedt <bil@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>, guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Experience with guile + Boehm GC in SND (Re: New versions of rt-compiler.scm, rt-examples.scm and rt.tex
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 09:53:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87hcpmj0rc.fsf@laas.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706041947280.16860@ttleush> (Kjetil S. Matheussen's message of "Mon, 4 Jun 2007 20:00:07 +0200 (CEST)")
Hi,
"Kjetil S. Matheussen" <k.s.matheussen@notam02.no> writes:
> and for guile I think you use -rpath? :
Yes.
> No. But I have ran a series of benchmarks now:
Thanks for doing this!
To sum up, BGC is always slower but usually more memory-efficient than
GGC.
In Guile + libgc, you could try adding:
GC_set_free_space_divisor (2);
right before `GC_expand_hp ()' in `libguile/gc.c'. AIUI, this would
trade memory for CPU time.
Ideally, we'd need a better benchmarking framework, where each benchmark
is run tens of times and where both the average and variance are
reported. Unfortunately, I don't have much time to work on it right
now.
Thanks,
Ludovic.
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-05 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706031204540.9006@ttleush>
[not found] ` <20070603110930.M29119@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>
2007-06-03 14:57 ` Experience with guile + Boehm GC in SND (Re: New versions of rt-compiler.scm, rt-examples.scm and rt.tex Kjetil Svalastog Matheussen
2007-06-03 16:33 ` Kjetil Svalastog Matheussen
2007-06-03 20:07 ` Kjetil Svalastog Matheussen
2007-06-04 11:39 ` Ludovic Courtès
2007-06-04 12:08 ` Kjetil S. Matheussen
2007-06-04 12:45 ` Kjetil S. Matheussen
2007-06-04 13:22 ` Ludovic Courtès
2007-06-04 16:11 ` Kjetil S. Matheussen
2007-06-04 16:50 ` Ludovic Courtès
2007-06-04 18:00 ` Kjetil S. Matheussen
2007-06-04 18:14 ` Kjetil S. Matheussen
2007-06-05 7:53 ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87hcpmj0rc.fsf@laas.fr \
--to=ludovic.courtes@laas.fr \
--cc=bil@ccrma.Stanford.EDU \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=k.s.matheussen@notam02.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).