From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: vm status update Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:06:11 +0100 Message-ID: <87hc4dybyk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <49dd78620812281450v7aa3eb69h766861052bca35a3@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1231171644 9909 80.91.229.12 (5 Jan 2009 16:07:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 16:07:24 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 05 17:08:35 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LJs0E-00005n-4T for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:08:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42209 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LJryy-0000Af-PK for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:07:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LJryF-0008Br-Qp for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:06:27 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LJryE-0008B9-7x for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:06:27 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36708 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LJryD-0008B2-WE for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:06:26 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:53994 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LJryD-0001PQ-GG for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:06:25 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LJryB-0002pW-2o for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:06:23 +0000 Original-Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:06:23 +0000 Original-Received: from ludo by reverse-83.fdn.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:06:23 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 38 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: reverse-83.fdn.fr X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 16 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Niv=F4se?= an 217 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: i686-pc-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:7BDBJ8dL7+Vj8FpmrWdgpv+/aRk= X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:7961 Archived-At: Season greetings hackers! "Neil Jerram" writes: > Nice. Regarding the merge to master, though, > > - I think that would imply that the VM is included in the next release > series (1.10.x or 2.0.x); is that your intention? (I have no > objection!) No objection either, but... some benchmarking would be really nice. :-) Also, what's the status of the VM/compiler test suite? > - if yes to that, even so it might help us to hold off on the merge > for now, until we've finished reviewing everything else in > branch_release-1-8..master, and moving _out_ anything that should be > in the next release series. Did you mean "that should *not* be"? > Now the last point makes it sound as though there's actually a plan > here, and I'm afraid there isn't really. But I've recently been > looking at the branch_release-1-8..master diffs, and reverting some > that shouldn't have been there, and I think Ludovic may have been > doing a little of that too. What are you referring too? Some time between 1.8.5 and 1.8.6, I added `SCM_INTERNAL' and then reverted it from `branch_release-1-8' as it would have caused ABI incompatibilities. But that's the only thing I remember of. Do you think there are things currently in `master' that should be reverted? Thanks, Ludo'.