From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Broken Backtraces, and Part of a Solution Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 07:13:37 -0700 Message-ID: <87hawexzhq.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87zka8y1y7.fsf@pobox.com> <87sjg0y03d.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1334931271 26267 80.91.229.3 (20 Apr 2012 14:14:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:14:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: Noah Lavine Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 20 16:14:30 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SLEbR-0002cd-0i for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 16:14:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35575 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SLEbQ-0006ah-Ay for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:14:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50500) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SLEbM-0006aY-9a for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:14:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SLEbC-0001xT-DB for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:14:19 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:45007 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SLEbC-0001uQ-4W for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:14:10 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08DA383E0; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:13:46 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=zxAS61VLb9IFfc3p2PagATVBIUQ=; b=tuPQ2G zfjVo2pcD+9K1htQuem9mcUtW6kSVto70zHSurfkTTsT4+UaaKtg5Nznw5n2RqLV 6MNCE+FcxQQw/u9Uu+p45TIBkl5hOMhqlBHrZ8rirm4+Stz8RIJnwa5SPoF+4b35 2LUe7gZDoocGvD00nu9XUf2vHAZbScBo+8c/c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=puMQ9B5o5PeyG7LWLOiQ3G2BRFaWqQrA k8eAMVr7uoDVHVGZLbNnMugUZyuNlav5WqU38xitFGh9zYhjnaJTy/SxR2147aLQ vBT41srhK3MS4DBBnDX06G8MNN95TuE7Hi+6VxQ3CEMWeeAJWVjaD2l8gpNW9fno nhFsukYq85c= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01A7F83DF; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:13:46 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [205.158.58.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 690E683DE; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:13:45 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Noah Lavine's message of "Thu, 19 Apr 2012 22:47:14 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 0A7B13C4-8AF3-11E1-8BA6-B1B0728A0A4D-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 74.115.168.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:14291 Archived-At: On Thu 19 Apr 2012 19:47, Noah Lavine writes: > After looking at it more, there aren't really enough stack functions > to warrant a test suite. Any objections if I push this to master? I haven't had time to look at it, but if you think it's right, please go ahead. :) Cheers, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/