unofficial mirror of guile-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
To: guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Growable arrays?
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2012 14:32:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87hauku0mb.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)


Hi,

the main data structure of Lua is a "table", an associative array, and a
table t has a continguous numerically addressed part from 1..#t, with
all other indices going through a hashing mechanism.  One principal
distinguishing feature, like with a Scheme hashtable, is the ability to
grow on-demand.

Scheme/Guile vectors are fixed size.  Now I have a situation where I
have a basic type lattice with records stored in vectors, and this type
lattice may be extended dynamically (which typically happens at the
start of a whole file, for potentially multi-file runs).  Scheme does
not offer a suitable data structure for that.  It is a bit of a nuisance
that one can grow a hashtable efficiently and on-demand, but not so an
array.

Now it would be possible when the type lattice gets extended to store
the new entries in a hashtable and go from there.  Or put them into a
list, and reallocate on first access beyond the existing element.  That
seems rather contorted.  And since there is, if I remember, a project to
run Lua on top of Guile, having a fundamental and reasonably efficient
data structure corresponding to a Lua table, or at least the contiguous
part of a Lua table, would seem like a reasonably useful idea.  After
all, there already _is_ such a mechanism underlying hash tables so it
seems somewhat peculiar not to have it available for vectors as well.

Suggestions?

-- 
David Kastrup




             reply	other threads:[~2012-06-09 12:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-09 12:32 David Kastrup [this message]
2012-06-09 14:43 ` Growable arrays? Krister Svanlund
2012-06-09 17:35   ` David Kastrup
2012-06-11  4:23 ` Daniel Hartwig
2012-06-11  4:37   ` David Kastrup
2012-06-11  5:00     ` Daniel Hartwig
2012-06-11  7:25       ` David Kastrup
2012-06-11  9:01         ` Daniel Hartwig
2012-06-11  9:13           ` Daniel Hartwig
2012-06-11 10:38             ` David Kastrup
2012-06-11 11:57               ` Daniel Hartwig
2012-06-11 12:13         ` Noah Lavine
2012-06-11 12:28           ` David Kastrup
2012-06-11 23:50             ` Mark H Weaver
2012-06-12  9:34               ` David Kastrup
2012-06-12 20:34                 ` Mark H Weaver
2012-06-12 20:47                   ` David Kastrup
2012-06-12 21:03                     ` Mark H Weaver
2012-06-12 21:18                       ` David Kastrup
2012-06-11  8:14 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2012-06-11  9:08 ` Andy Wingo
2012-06-11  9:55   ` David Kastrup
2012-06-11 11:25     ` Andy Wingo
2012-06-11 12:00       ` David Kastrup
2012-06-11 12:12         ` David Kastrup
2012-06-11 12:20           ` David Kastrup
2012-06-11 13:04             ` Daniel Hartwig
2012-06-11 14:19               ` David Kastrup
2012-06-11 15:24                 ` Stefan Israelsson Tampe
2012-06-11 15:27                 ` Andy Wingo
2012-06-11 16:03                   ` David Kastrup
2012-06-11 12:20         ` Daniel Hartwig
2012-06-11 12:36           ` David Kastrup
2012-06-11 12:02 ` Ludovic Courtès
2012-06-12 13:36 ` Hans Aberg
2012-06-14 14:33 ` Mark H Weaver
2012-06-14 14:47   ` David Kastrup
2012-06-14 15:23     ` Daniel Hartwig
2012-06-14 15:34       ` David Kastrup
2012-06-14 16:56         ` Daniel Hartwig
2012-06-14 17:15           ` David Kastrup
2012-06-14 17:23             ` Daniel Hartwig
2012-06-14 17:49               ` David Kastrup

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87hauku0mb.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org \
    --to=dak@gnu.org \
    --cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).