From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: gen gc Date: 20 Jul 2002 00:58:52 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87fzyfcok3.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> References: <15669.59575.560391.128570@blauw.xs4all.nl> <871ya2ezjo.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <15669.63974.973133.308661@blauw.xs4all.nl> <3D36AFBC.1000206@puremagic.com> <15670.44970.137101.467470@meddo.cs.uu.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1027119570 2325 127.0.0.1 (19 Jul 2002 22:59:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 22:59:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Miroslav Silovic , guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17Vgif-0000bO-00 for ; Sat, 20 Jul 2002 00:59:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17VgiW-00086B-00; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 18:59:20 -0400 Original-Received: from dialin.speedway42.dip95.dokom.de ([195.138.42.95] helo=zagadka.ping.de) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17Vgi5-00085l-00 for ; Fri, 19 Jul 2002 18:58:53 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 3111 invoked by uid 1000); 19 Jul 2002 22:58:52 -0000 Original-To: Han-Wen Nienhuys In-Reply-To: <15670.44970.137101.467470@meddo.cs.uu.nl> Original-Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:835 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:835 Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > Anyways, the goops code only uses the address for printing, so it > would safe to return the address. I suggest that the documentation be > changed to > > "Return the address of OBJ as an integer. Note that this > address may change between runs due to garbage collection." I'd say it would be better to also change the name of the function so that nobody is tricked by the changed semantics. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel