* test for weak + struct bug @ 2004-08-31 22:11 Han-Wen Nienhuys 2004-09-01 1:41 ` Kevin Ryde 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Han-Wen Nienhuys @ 2004-08-31 22:11 UTC (permalink / raw) here is a shorter test case for Kevin's bug, in case anyone is interested in adding it to the test suite. The display should be replaced by a suitable check. (define rec-type (make-record-type "foo" '())) (define h (make-weak-value-hash-table 61)) (hash-set! h "foo" ((record-constructor rec-type))) (gc) (display (hash-ref h "foo")) -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | hanwen@xs4all.nl | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: test for weak + struct bug 2004-08-31 22:11 test for weak + struct bug Han-Wen Nienhuys @ 2004-09-01 1:41 ` Kevin Ryde 2004-09-01 6:59 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Kevin Ryde @ 2004-09-01 1:41 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: guile-devel Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@xs4all.nl> writes: > > here is a shorter test case for Kevin's bug, in case anyone is > interested in adding it to the test suite. The display should be > replaced by a suitable check. Beaut, I added it. (I don't normally think much of adding a test before a fix, but this is pretty fundamental.) _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: test for weak + struct bug 2004-09-01 1:41 ` Kevin Ryde @ 2004-09-01 6:59 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys 2004-09-01 22:04 ` Kevin Ryde 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Han-Wen Nienhuys @ 2004-09-01 6:59 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: guile-devel user42@zip.com.au writes: > Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@xs4all.nl> writes: > > > > here is a shorter test case for Kevin's bug, in case anyone is > > interested in adding it to the test suite. The display should be > > replaced by a suitable check. > > Beaut, I added it. > > (I don't normally think much of adding a test before a fix, but this > is pretty fundamental.) I already fixed the problem in 1.6 CVS. Can you test 1.7 too? -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | hanwen@xs4all.nl | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: test for weak + struct bug 2004-09-01 6:59 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys @ 2004-09-01 22:04 ` Kevin Ryde 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Kevin Ryde @ 2004-09-01 22:04 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: guile-devel Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@xs4all.nl> writes: > > Can you test 1.7 too? Yes, it was fine already (both that test and my program that tickled it in 1.6). _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-09-01 22:04 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2004-08-31 22:11 test for weak + struct bug Han-Wen Nienhuys 2004-09-01 1:41 ` Kevin Ryde 2004-09-01 6:59 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys 2004-09-01 22:04 ` Kevin Ryde
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).