From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Commercial development Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 23:56:44 +0300 Message-ID: <87fyvohasz.fsf@zagadka.de> References: <115t7ajdbfq8348@corp.supernews.com> <871x966hwn.fsf@naia.workingwithlinux.com> <426505c8$0$196$edfadb0f@dread12.news.tele.dk> <426601FF.6010600@ossau.uklinux.net> <9qGdnYkVut1t0PvfRVn-rw@giganews.com> <4266AB46.2050107@ossau.uklinux.net> <4266AC41.4050105@ossau.uklinux.net> <87zmu4k03x.fsf@zagadka.de> <42A619D7.3040703@ossau.uklinux.net> <42A740F5.90400@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1118523476 16355 80.91.229.2 (11 Jun 2005 20:57:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 20:57:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 11 22:57:51 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DhD2g-00081O-4N for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 22:57:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DhD78-0002Bh-8A for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 17:01:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DhD5V-0001Yw-Np for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 17:00:18 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DhD5R-0001Wh-99 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 17:00:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DhD5Q-0001Vl-LU for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 17:00:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [213.243.153.35] (helo=smtp2.pp.htv.fi) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DhD2l-0000Tx-58 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 16:57:27 -0400 Original-Received: from zagadka.ping.de (cs181072157.pp.htv.fi [82.181.72.157]) by smtp2.pp.htv.fi (Postfix) with SMTP id 87444296BCB for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 23:56:44 +0300 (EEST) Original-Received: (qmail 29122 invoked by uid 1000); 11 Jun 2005 20:56:44 -0000 Original-To: Neil Jerram In-Reply-To: <42A740F5.90400@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Wed, 08 Jun 2005 20:03:17 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5098 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5098 Neil Jerram writes: > Cunning, isn't it? It passes the test because a continuation captured > during an ecache_evalx call will preserve the values on the stack, and > because the values on the stack are not affected by set!s on the letrec > environment. Yep, I was thinkning in this direction as well... looks like the right approach. > What do you think? It seems like a very self-contained trick, so I > think we could easily copy it to Guile. The trick: yes; the code: probably not. Neil, do you want to do it? -- GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel