From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Plan for guile-debugging integration Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 18:38:03 +0100 Message-ID: <87fygyu83o.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <87mzcdm3v5.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87ac89sibc.fsf@laas.fr> <87k678f1h7.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87ac7y6duw.fsf@laas.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1153244318 8913 80.91.229.2 (18 Jul 2006 17:38:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 17:38:38 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 18 19:38:36 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G2tWR-0006Nv-9I for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 19:38:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G2tWQ-0004F2-IB for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:38:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G2tWL-0004BP-S7 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:38:09 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G2tWJ-00047l-GG for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:38:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G2tWJ-00047Q-2Y for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:38:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.84.72.33] (helo=mail3.uklinux.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G2tZE-0008L8-TQ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:41:09 -0400 Original-Received: from laruns (host86-143-154-55.range86-143.btcentralplus.com [86.143.154.55]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB38540A099 for ; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 17:38:04 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from laruns (laruns [127.0.0.1]) by laruns (Postfix) with ESMTP id E42026F709 for ; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 18:38:03 +0100 (BST) Original-To: Guile Development In-Reply-To: <87ac7y6duw.fsf@laas.fr> ( =?iso-8859-1?q?Ludovic_Court=E8s's_message_of?= "Tue, 27 Jun 2006 13:24:07 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:6004 Archived-At: ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic Court=E8s) writes: > Actually, it might be time for a more rational name space... ;-) > > Keisuke (at least) had come up with the idea of a `system' module > directory. So you would put the debugging material under `(system > debugging)' rather than adding yet another thing under `ice-9'. > > What do you think? Are people fond of `ice-9'? :-) [...silence...] It seems people aren't that bothered. :-) I think we should we wait until there's a big enough mass of Guile stuff out there that the current organization becomes a problem. When we have a real problem to solve, we'll probably have a better idea about the solution. Regards, Neil _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel