From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Guile + Boehm GC: First Remarks Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 19:47:06 +0100 Message-ID: <87fydcteqd.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <877j42r32u.fsf@laas.fr> <87irnmt0nk.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87ac8x8g35.fsf@laas.fr> <87lksgqv1r.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <877j3zlofr.fsf@laas.fr> <87d58svh35.fsf@laas.fr> <45360E34.60708@xs4all.nl> <8764eg1ix5.fsf@laas.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1161802132 12180 80.91.229.2 (25 Oct 2006 18:48:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 18:48:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 25 20:48:48 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gcno0-0008Pq-7k for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:48:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gcnnz-00013i-M3 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:48:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gcnnw-00012L-Tt for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:48:44 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gcnnw-00011r-K4 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:48:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gcnnw-00011i-BY for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:48:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.84.72.33] (helo=mail3.uklinux.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Gcnnw-0002D0-EF for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:48:44 -0400 Original-Received: from laruns (host86-145-51-69.range86-145.btcentralplus.com [86.145.51.69]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F33E240AC92; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 18:47:58 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from laruns (laruns [127.0.0.1]) by laruns (Postfix) with ESMTP id 788806F773; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 19:47:06 +0100 (BST) Original-To: hanwen@xs4all.nl In-Reply-To: <8764eg1ix5.fsf@laas.fr> ( =?iso-8859-1?q?Ludovic_Court=E8s's_message_of?= "Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:25:58 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:6181 Archived-At: ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic Court=E8s) writes: > Yes, `autogen.sh' makes a lot of assumptions about what your file system > should contain. Personally, I no longer use it: I use the more reliable > (and less intrusive) `autoreconf -i'. > > I think we should either remove that script or simply have it contain > that `autoreconf' invocation. Perhaps, but we'd need more discussion of the other things that the script does first. Given that you can choose just to use autoreconf if you want to, I don't think the discussion's worth it right now. Regards, Neil _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel