From: Neil Jerram <neil@ossau.uklinux.net>
To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Guile-commits] GNU Guile branch, wip-1-8-mingw-build, updated. release_1-8-7-22-g7edad77
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:31:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fx3ngbyt.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877hpnwyqo.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Sun, 07 Mar 2010 22:30:55 +0000")
Neil Jerram <neil@ossau.uklinux.net> writes:
> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Hi Neil,
>>
>> "Neil Jerram" <neil@ossau.uklinux.net> writes:
>>
>>> commit f41529c37b4a740aa555741ca78faa55fafcb3c0
>>> Author: Neil Jerram <neil@ossau.uklinux.net>
>>> Date: Tue Mar 2 23:23:52 2010 +0000
>>>
>>> Make test scripts check GUILE environment variable
>>>
>>> So that they use the guile (or guile.exe, in the MinGW case) that was
>>> just built, and not just any guile that can be found in the PATH.
>>
>> The ‘TESTS_ENVIRONMENT’ variable in ‘test-suite/standalone/Makefile.am’
>> normally ensures that tests are run with the just-built guile, when run
>> with ‘make check’.
>
> Thanks. I'll look into this more carefully then.
FWIW, the problem was the ".exe" extension that the MinGW cross-build
adds to generated executables. On Linux, even if you have Wine
installed, so that NAME.exe is runnable, and even if NAME.exe is in the
PATH, the shell won't find NAME.exe if you ask it for NAME.
(When compiling on Windows I would guess that there isn't this problem.
CMD.EXE will certainly find NAME.exe, and I can imagine that the MSYS
shell has been patched to do that too.)
But anyway, following more careful thinking and feedback from the
"Reconsideration of MinGW" thread, I think that that method of
cross-building (i.e. with a cross-compiler and Wine on Linux) is pretty
unfruitful and I don't propose to continue it.
I'll leave the wip-1-8-mingw-build branch in the repository, in case
it's of interest, and because I don't know if branches can be deleted.
Is there a nice way of marking a branch as obsolete/historical, or of
adding an explanatory note to it?
Regards,
Neil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-26 0:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <E1NnhBU-0002dm-1u@vcs-noshell.in.savannah.gnu.org>
2010-03-06 22:22 ` [Guile-commits] GNU Guile branch, wip-1-8-mingw-build, updated. release_1-8-7-22-g7edad77 Ludovic Courtès
2010-03-07 22:30 ` Neil Jerram
2010-03-26 0:31 ` Neil Jerram [this message]
2010-03-26 12:07 ` Andy Wingo
2010-03-26 13:37 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2010-03-26 22:42 ` Neil Jerram
2010-03-26 22:17 ` Neil Jerram
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87fx3ngbyt.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net \
--to=neil@ossau.uklinux.net \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=ludo@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).