From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: srfe records in reworked match Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:27:03 +0200 Message-ID: <87fx2n8yg8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <201004201514.18375.stefan.tampe@spray.se> <878w8hkxky.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1271939261 17794 80.91.229.12 (22 Apr 2010 12:27:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:27:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 22 14:27:39 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O4vVK-0006iC-10 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:27:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37155 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O4vVJ-0007fk-AF for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:27:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O4vUy-0007bI-RU for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:27:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52069 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O4vUq-0007X9-Do for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:27:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O4vUo-0007ta-89 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:27:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.105]:53195) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O4vUo-0007tK-2j for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:27:06 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.52,256,1270418400"; d="scan'208";a="61093911" Original-Received: from laptop-147-210-128-170.labri.fr (HELO nixey) ([147.210.128.170]) by mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA; 22 Apr 2010 14:27:04 +0200 X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 3 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Flor=E9al?= an 218 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: (Andy Wingo's message of "Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:13:58 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10288 Archived-At: Andy Wingo writes: > On Wed 21 Apr 2010 10:40, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > >> FWIW I=E2=80=99d really prefer if it could work with SRFI-9 (which is pu= rely >> syntactic, so there=E2=80=99s no run-time record type descriptor) rather= than >> with Guile=E2=80=99s records (as above). > > There is a run-time rtd, of sorts; it is the struct-vtable. Yes, but it=E2=80=99s Guile-specific. > There would be no penalty making Guile's records interoperable with > SRFI-9 records. Currently Guile=E2=80=99s SRFI-9 accessors are =E2=80=9Cintegratable=E2=80= =9D whereas record accessors aren=E2=80=99t. IOW, until Guile has an inliner, there=E2=80=99d= be a penalty making them interoperable. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.