From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [d.love@dl.ac.uk: dynamic loading of native code modules] Date: 28 Apr 2002 17:32:34 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87elgzn8j1.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> References: <878z7rqfrg.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87znztllbx.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87znzsdcde.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1020007825 8679 127.0.0.1 (28 Apr 2002 15:30:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 15:30:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rlb@defaultvalue.org, guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 171qd6-0002Fs-00 for ; Sun, 28 Apr 2002 17:30:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 171qcx-0006Fn-00; Sun, 28 Apr 2002 11:30:15 -0400 Original-Received: from dialin.speedway42.dip240.dokom.de ([195.138.42.240] helo=zagadka.ping.de) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 171qbZ-00068F-00 for ; Sun, 28 Apr 2002 11:28:49 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 1155 invoked by uid 1000); 28 Apr 2002 15:32:34 -0000 Original-To: ttn@glug.org In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 22 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:542 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:542 Thien-Thi Nguyen writes: > From: Marius Vollmer > Date: 24 Apr 2002 23:18:21 +0200 > > Uh, oh, I have finally taken some time to go over the bug reports > that sit unhandled on the mailing lists, and I have tagged a few of > them as release critical. They should all be quite straightforward, > tho... > > do you mind explaining your criteria? i'm glad to play scribe here. I can explain the criteria for each bug specifically, but I wouldn't feel comfortable to do this generally. One fundamental criterium, however, is that the fix does not affect people who are not also affected by the bug. When the fix is also short and well localized, and the bug is relatively severe (i.e., making Guile fail to compile on a not-really-obscure platform), I'm tempted to make it release critical. But note that Rob is now the one to make the last call. I didn't really respect this previously, but I will in the future. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel