From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: module GC bug Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 22:14:32 +0300 Message-ID: <87ek9cjgmf.fsf@zagadka.de> References: <42A8D188.20007@xs4all.nl> <878xzma4o6.fsf@zagadka.de> <42EE63F9.4080102@xs4all.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1123010404 31245 80.91.229.2 (2 Aug 2005 19:20:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 19:20:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 02 21:19:59 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E02IQ-0001sH-5v for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 21:19:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E02L8-0001Uq-Eq for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 15:22:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E02KG-0001FF-SK for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 15:21:21 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E02K7-0001B4-Sr for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 15:21:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E02K7-00019O-Ex for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 15:21:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [213.243.153.35] (helo=smtp2.pp.htv.fi) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1E02Q1-0005U7-CX for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 15:27:17 -0400 Original-Received: from zagadka.ping.de (cs181072157.pp.htv.fi [82.181.72.157]) by smtp2.pp.htv.fi (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E083296BDA for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2005 22:14:27 +0300 (EEST) Original-Received: (qmail 6315 invoked by uid 1000); 2 Aug 2005 19:14:32 -0000 Original-To: Han-Wen Nienhuys User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5182 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:5182 Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > Well, almost. The scm_stand_in_scm_procs need to be weak too. It is; this change will remain in 1.6. Sorry that I wasn't clear about that. With "too large" I was only referring to the changed semantics of weak hash tables and guardians. -- GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel