From: Marius Vollmer <mvo@zagadka.de>
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: No way out.
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 03:07:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ek4p3ebc.fsf@zagadka.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200512042008.00333.bkorb@gnu.org> (Bruce Korb's message of "Sun, 4 Dec 2005 20:08:00 -0800")
Bruce Korb <bkorb@gnu.org> writes:
> Anyway, *real bugs* in Guile 1.7.2 are:
>
> 1. When an error is thrown, "exit" should be called with
> EXIT_FAILURE, not 0.
I agree. In 1.7.2, Guile no longer exits the whole program when an
uncaught error happens; it only exits the current thread with
"pthread_exit (NULL)". If the current thread is the one running
'main', the process exits with return code 0. Is there a way to
return an exit code with pthread_exit?
> 2. After these commands:
>
> (use-modules (ice-9 stack-catch))
> (debug-enable 'backtrace)
>
> I should be getting stack traces on Scheme errors. I'm not.
> (And, yes, I invoke either ``(backtrace)'' or ``scm_backtrace()''
> when a failure is detected.)
Only "(debug-enable 'backtrace)" should be necessary.
However, you only get backtraces when the error happens from with the
usual read-eval-print-loop. For example, this file
(debug-enable 'backtrace)
(define (foo)
(+ 2 'a))
(foo)
gives no backtrace when executed with
$ guile -l x.scm
but you get a backtrace with
$ guile
guile> (load "x.scm")
And yes, this can be considered a bug, too... :-)
> I can get file and line information for 1.6.7 and earlier
> *only*. There seems to be no way to do it in 1.7.
I will come back to this.
--
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-07 1:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-01 0:16 gh_inexact_p error in 1.7.x Bruce Korb
2005-12-01 0:44 ` Kevin Ryde
2005-12-05 4:08 ` No way out Bruce Korb
2005-12-05 4:35 ` Bruce Korb
2005-12-07 1:31 ` Marius Vollmer
2005-12-05 22:20 ` Kevin Ryde
2005-12-06 10:58 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2005-12-28 15:59 ` Neil Jerram
2005-12-31 15:09 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2005-12-31 15:14 ` Neil Jerram
2006-01-01 19:58 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
2006-01-02 15:42 ` Neil Jerram
2006-01-02 18:54 ` Neil Jerram
2006-01-04 21:13 ` Backtrace and enhanced catch Neil Jerram
2006-01-14 12:41 ` Neil Jerram
2006-01-22 13:47 ` Marius Vollmer
2006-01-23 20:11 ` Neil Jerram
2006-01-24 21:34 ` Marius Vollmer
2006-01-16 8:38 ` Ludovic Courtès
2006-01-18 23:08 ` Neil Jerram
2006-01-19 9:38 ` Ludovic Courtès
2006-01-21 11:26 ` Neil Jerram
2006-01-26 23:29 ` Kevin Ryde
2006-01-27 19:30 ` Neil Jerram
2006-01-31 20:07 ` Kevin Ryde
2006-02-01 23:04 ` Neil Jerram
2006-02-04 0:46 ` Kevin Ryde
2006-02-04 15:41 ` Neil Jerram
2005-12-07 1:07 ` Marius Vollmer [this message]
2005-12-07 1:55 ` No way out Rob Browning
2005-12-13 20:32 ` Marius Vollmer
2005-12-28 16:09 ` Neil Jerram
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ek4p3ebc.fsf@zagadka.de \
--to=mvo@zagadka.de \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).