From: Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: 1.8 make check failing in popen.test
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 18:16:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ejujkxsr.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zmd7sn8s.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org> (Rob Browning's message of "Sun, 10 Sep 2006 09:24:51 -0700")
Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org> writes:
> Though not conclusive, these results, when combined with the gdb
> backtrace I posted earlier showing the blockage in scm_gc() while
> trying to lock a a mutex, seem to suggest that the remaining problem
> is thread related.
On a related topic, in order for Guile 1.8 to make it into Debian etch
(the upcoming stable release), we're essentially out of time to fix
this problem. Because of this I'm contemplating uploading the initial
Guile 1.8 packages with --with-threads=no.
Does anyone see any major problems with this stopgap? It seems better
to have Guile 1.8 in etch without threads than not to have it at all.
Note that this issue doesn't just affect Guile. It's my understanding
that unless Guile 1.8 packages are uploaded very soon, the newer
version of lilypond won't make it into etch either.
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-11 1:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-23 8:37 1.8 make check failing in popen.test Rob Browning
2006-07-23 22:36 ` Kevin Ryde
2006-07-23 23:12 ` Rob Browning
2006-07-24 7:25 ` Ludovic Courtès
2006-07-30 1:59 ` Rob Browning
2006-08-15 8:35 ` Rob Browning
2006-08-15 23:13 ` Kevin Ryde
2006-08-16 1:18 ` Rob Browning
2006-08-16 23:26 ` Kevin Ryde
2006-08-18 3:01 ` Rob Browning
2006-08-21 23:38 ` Kevin Ryde
2006-08-22 2:03 ` Rob Browning
2006-08-25 1:16 ` Kevin Ryde
2006-08-25 2:39 ` Rob Browning
2006-08-27 20:06 ` Rob Browning
2006-08-27 20:22 ` Rob Browning
2006-08-30 7:50 ` Rob Browning
2006-08-31 0:24 ` Kevin Ryde
2006-08-31 6:28 ` Rob Browning
2006-09-04 2:45 ` Rob Browning
2006-09-07 20:46 ` Kevin Ryde
2006-09-08 2:45 ` Rob Browning
2006-09-08 23:05 ` Kevin Ryde
2006-09-09 12:52 ` Marius Vollmer
2006-09-09 16:39 ` Rob Browning
2006-09-10 16:24 ` Rob Browning
2006-09-11 1:16 ` Rob Browning [this message]
2006-09-11 6:40 ` Neil Jerram
2006-09-11 15:57 ` Rob Browning
2006-09-11 17:40 ` Neil Jerram
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ejujkxsr.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org \
--to=rlb@defaultvalue.org \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).